Radiocarbon dating age of the earth Sex chatt mobile phons

There are many ways to keep track of time, the most reliable of which is to use actual records such as counting hours, days, weeks, and years.However, when we speak of the distant past, there are no historical records and thus no verifiable way to prove that a certain 'date' is correct.When scientists at the University of Regina, Saskatchewan were asked what the results would be if these roots were dated by Potassium Argon method.Their response was that the results: Two well-documented examples of "heat contamination" are the 18 eruptions from two Hawaiian volcanoes.

radiocarbon dating age of the earth-54

For example, In 1973, in Alberta, Canada (near the town of Grand Prairie) a high voltage line fell which caused nearby tree roots to fossilize almost instantly.

And since the earth is not a closed system, these last two assumptions make radiometric dating highly subjective and questionable.

For example, if a rock sample was below the water table at any time, leaching would take place.

Although these eruptions were less than 200 years old, the radiometric "dates" obtained from them were 140 million to 2.96 billion years for one, and from 0 to 29 million years for the other -- depending upon the (ocean) depth at which the lava sample was obtained. This also brings up an important question: If radiometric dating methods are unable to produce the correct date in cases where the actual date of eruption is known, why should we believe that these same methods can produce accurate dates when the date of eruption is unknown?

The point is simply this: radiometric dating is known to produce grossly erroneous dates when heat is involved in the formation or fossilization process.

Leave a Reply